MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
04420nas a22003137a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20210428100624.0 |
| 006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
m|||||r|||| 00| 0 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
ta |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
171219t2012 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa | |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
1578-0740 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
Salus Infirmorum |
| 245 03 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
La identificación del recién nacido: asignatura pendiente = |
| Remainder of title |
The identification of the newborn: subject pending / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
M.ª Concepción Sanz-Díaz, M.ª Isabel Espinal-Ramón, Aránzazu Domínguez-Luna, Sara Fernández-Muñoz, Fátima Cardesa-Sabio, Montserrat Hernández-Prieto |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Este artículo se encuentra disponible en su edición impresa. |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc. note |
Bibliografía: p.72 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Objetivo: Comparar un método clásico de identificación por huella dactilar frente al estudio de ADN. Material y método: Los sujetos de estudio fueron recién nacidos y madres. Se recogieron 60 muestras de huellas dactilares de madres e hijos, impresas en una hoja de papel blanco con un tampón comercial de tinta, y se enviaron a la policía científica para ser<br/>analizadas y demostrar su validez en identificar al niño y vincularlo con su madre. Se examinaron la toma, la calidad de la toma y el valor identificativo de la impresión. Posteriormente se enviaron 20 muestras de sangre de madres e hijos (en papel FTA®) a un laboratorio, para el estudio del ADN y<br/>comprobar si era posible identificar al recién nacido y vincularlo con su madre tras el parto. En la última fase se pidió a la policía que analizara las huellas dactilares de madres e hijos, obtenidas a través de un escáner digital, durante un periodo determinado de tiempo. Resultados: De las huellas dactilares de los recién nacidos, ninguna tuvo valor identificativo. De las madres, 21 de 30 fueron identificables. En cuanto al escáner digital, no se apreció ninguna diferencia significativa con el sistema de recogida con tampón de tinta. De las muestras de sangre, la concentración de ADN<br/>fue alta y suficiente para realizar los perfiles genéticos de madres e hijos y vincularlos genéticamente. Conclusiones: La correcta identificación del recién nacido requiere una técnica segura y fiable. La huella dactilar podría cumplir estos requisitos pero, tal y como se está realizando la impronta, no<br/>es fiable. El análisis de ADN en sangre sí es un método seguro y fiable. |
| 520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Aim: To compare a classical method for newborn identification (fingerprint) with DNA studies for identification. The study was carried out on newborns and their mothers. Methods: 60 fingerprint samples, printed on white paper by using a commercial inkpad were obtained from newborns and their mothers and submitted to the scientific police for analysis.<br/>The appropriateness of this procedure for identifying the newborn and linking he/she to his/her mother was assessed, by analyzing the quality as well as the identifying value of the printing. Later, 20 blood samples from newborns and their mothers were collected on FTA® paper and submitted<br/>to a laboratory for DNA study, determining the appropriateness of this method for identification and mother-to-child linkage. Finally, some members from the police were asked to check out the fingerprints from newborns and their mothers obtained by using a live scanner. Results: None of the fingerprints obtained from newborns were appropriate for identification. Twenty-one out of 30 mothers were identifiable by this procedure.<br/>No differences were observed between live scanner and ink fingerprints on paper. In all blood samples the amount of DNA detected was sufficient and appropriate to perform the genetic profile of newborns and mothers,<br/>thus linking them genetically. Conclusions: Appropriate identification of newborns warrants a safe and reliable method. Fingerprinting meet such requirements theoretically, but as currently carried out the printing is unreliable. By contrast, DNA analysis from blood samples is safe and reliable. |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
identificación |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
recién nacido |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
huella dactilar |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
ADN |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
identification |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
newborn |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
fingerprint |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
DNA |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Related parts |
-- 2012 v. 13, n.3-4, p.66-72 |
| Title |
Matronas profesión. |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
|---|
| Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://www.federacion-matronas.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/original-identificacion-vol13-3-4.pdf">https://www.federacion-matronas.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/original-identificacion-vol13-3-4.pdf</a> |
| Link text |
Acceso a texto completo |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Universal Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type |
Artículo de revista |
