Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia Salus Infirmorum

Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery / Brandon M. Togioka, David Yanez, Michael F. Aziz, Janna R. Higgins, Praveen Tekkali and Miriam M. Treggiari

Material type: Continuing resourceContinuing resourceDescription: 448kbISSN: 0007-0912Subject(s): acetylcholinesterase inhibitor | cyclodextrin | neostigmine | neuromuscular block | pulmonary complications | rocuronium | sugammadex In: British Journal of Anaesthesia -- 2020 v. 124, n.5, p.553-561Summary: Background: Residual neuromuscular block has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. We hypothesised that sugammadex reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients aged �70 yr having surgery�3 h, compared with neostigmine. Methods: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. At surgical closure, subjects were equally randomised to receive sugammadex 2 mg kg�1 or neostigmine 0.07 mg kg�1 (maximum 5 mg) for rocuronium reversal. The primary endpoint was incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary end-points included residual paralysis (train-of-four ratio <0.9 in the PACU) and Phase 1 recovery (time to attain pain control and stable respiratory, haemodynamic, and neurological status). The analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: Of the 200 subjects randomised, 98 received sugammadex and 99 received neostigmine. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary complications despite a signal towards reduced incidence for sugammadex (33% vs 40%; odds ratio [OR]¼0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]¼[0.40, 1.37]; P¼0.30) compared with neostigmine. Sugammadex decreased residual neuromuscular block (10% vs 49%; OR¼0.11, 95% CI¼[0.04, 0.25]; P<0.001). Phase 1 recovery time was comparable between sugammadex (97.3 min [standard deviation, SD¼54.3]) and neostigmine (110.0 min [SD¼62.0]), difference e12.7 min (95% CI, [e29.2, 3.9], P¼0.13). In an exploratory analysis, there were fewer 30 day hospital readmissions in the sugammadex group compared with the neostigmine group (5% vs 15%; OR¼0.30, 95% CI¼[0.08, 0.91]; P¼0.03). Conclusions: In older adults undergoing prolonged surgery, sugammadex was associated with a 40% reduction in re-sidual neuromuscular block, a 10% reduction in 30 day hospital readmission rate, but no difference in the occurrence ofpostoperative pulmonary complications. Based on this exploratory study, larger studies should determine whether sugammadex may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and 30 day hospital readmissions. Clinical trial registration: NCT02861131.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículo de revista Artículo de revista Revistas y artículos
Non-fiction PP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 6027

Bibliografía: p.560-561

Background: Residual neuromuscular block has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. We hypothesised that sugammadex reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients aged �70 yr having surgery�3 h, compared with neostigmine.
Methods: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. At surgical closure, subjects were equally randomised to receive sugammadex 2 mg kg�1 or neostigmine 0.07 mg kg�1 (maximum 5 mg) for rocuronium reversal. The primary endpoint was incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary end-points included residual paralysis (train-of-four ratio <0.9 in the PACU) and Phase 1 recovery (time to attain pain control and stable respiratory, haemodynamic, and neurological status). The analysis was by intention-to-treat.
Results: Of the 200 subjects randomised, 98 received sugammadex and 99 received neostigmine. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary complications despite a signal towards reduced incidence for sugammadex (33% vs 40%; odds ratio [OR]¼0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]¼[0.40, 1.37]; P¼0.30) compared with neostigmine. Sugammadex decreased residual neuromuscular block (10% vs 49%; OR¼0.11, 95% CI¼[0.04, 0.25]; P<0.001).
Phase 1 recovery time was comparable between sugammadex (97.3 min [standard deviation, SD¼54.3]) and neostigmine (110.0 min [SD¼62.0]), difference e12.7 min (95% CI, [e29.2, 3.9], P¼0.13). In an exploratory analysis, there were fewer 30 day hospital readmissions in the sugammadex group compared with the neostigmine group (5% vs 15%; OR¼0.30, 95% CI¼[0.08, 0.91]; P¼0.03).
Conclusions: In older adults undergoing prolonged surgery, sugammadex was associated with a 40% reduction in re-sidual neuromuscular block, a 10% reduction in 30 day hospital readmission rate, but no difference in the occurrence ofpostoperative pulmonary complications. Based on this exploratory study, larger studies should determine whether sugammadex may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and 30 day hospital readmissions.
Clinical trial registration: NCT02861131.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha