Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia Salus Infirmorum

Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / Apostolos D. Prodromidis, Chrysoula Drosatou, Georgios C. Thivaios, Nasri Zreik and Charalambos P. Charalambous

Material type: Continuing resourceContinuing resourceISSN: 1552-3365Subject(s): anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) | reconstruction | timing | meniscal tears In: The American journal of sports medicine -- 2020, p. 1-12Summary: Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult. Purpose: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears. Results: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Conclusion: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículo de revista Artículo de revista Revistas y artículos
Non-fiction PP (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 5645

PDF en biblioteca

Bibliografía: p. 11-12

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is
unclear with regard to meniscal insult.
Purpose: To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development
of meniscal tears within this period.
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic
reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study
quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective
cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears.
Results: After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2
prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported
meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012)
showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate
of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine
whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated,
ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha