MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
04280nmi a22003497a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20221025172738.0 |
| 006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
m||||| |||| 00| 0 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
c| zz uauuu |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
180124d2022 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
Salus Infirmorum |
| 100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Hernández Cid, María |
| 9 (RLIN) |
3828 |
| 245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Dispositivos de terapia intravenosa en pacientes oncológicos / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
María Hernández Cid; tutor: Daniel Sánchez Rodríguez |
| Medium |
[Trabajo Fin de Grado] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2022 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
1 archivo (pdf.) ; |
| Dimensions |
1,47 MB |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Trabajo fin de grado. Defendido en 2022 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Introducción: En los pacientes oncológicos, el uso de catéteres venosos centrales <br/>(CVC), es una práctica clínica frecuente. Existen varios tipos de catéteres venosos <br/>centrales y todos ellos conllevan una serie de riesgos o complicaciones para los <br/>pacientes portadores de los mismos. Es por esto, que el presente trabajo tiene como <br/>objetivo comparar distintos tipos de accesos centrales para tratar de determinar cuál <br/>de ellos se asocia con una menor tasa de aparición de complicaciones, indicar si <br/>existe alguna medida de prevención de las mismas o factores de riesgo asociados. <br/>Material y métodos: Se llevo a cabo mediante una revisión bibliográfica en las <br/>bases de datos electrónicas de Pubmed, Scielo y Cinahl, en relación con las <br/>complicaciones asociadas a los catéteres venosos centrales en los pacientes con <br/>cáncer con el fin de alcanzar los objetivos planteados. <br/>Resultados: Siguiendo los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, se obtuvieron 15 <br/>artículos, empleados para dar respuesta a nuestros objetivos planteados.<br/>Conclusión: El uso del PICC comparado con el CICC es más seguro en la <br/>prevención de complicaciones. Los PICC se asocian con un mayor riesgo de <br/>eventos adversos relacionados con el catéter frente a los PORT. No existían <br/>diferencias entre los catéteres impregnados con clorhexidina y no tratados con este <br/>antiséptico en la aparición de complicaciones. El lugar de inserción del dispositivo no <br/>se asoció con complicaciones como la infección asociada al catéter, trombosis o <br/>eventos oclusivos en los pacientes afectados de cáncer. |
| 520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Introduction: In oncology patients, the use of central venous catheters (CVC) is <br/>an increasingly frequent clinical practice. There are several types of central <br/>venous catheters and all of them carry a series of risks or complications for the <br/>patients carrying them, such as, for example, catheter-related bloodstream <br/>infection or thrombosis. For this reason, the aim of the present study is to <br/>compare different types of central access to try to determine which of them is <br/>associated with a lower rate of complications, and to indicate whether there are <br/>any measures to prevent them or any associated risk factors. <br/>Methods: A literature review was carried out in the electronic databases of <br/>Pubmed, Scielo and Cinahl, in relation to the complications associated with <br/>central venous catheters in cancer patients in order to achieve the proposed <br/>objectives.<br/>Results: Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 articles were obtained, <br/>which were used to respond to our objectives.<br/>Conclusion: The use of PICC compared to CICC is safer in preventing <br/>complications. PICCs are associated with a higher risk of catheter-related <br/>adverse events compared to PORT. There were no differences between <br/>catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and not treated with this antiseptic in <br/>the occurrence of complications. Device insertion site was not associated with <br/>complications such as catheter-associated infection, thrombosis or occlusive <br/>events in cancer patients.<br/> |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
cateterismo venoso central |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
trombosis |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
infección relacionada con el catéter |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
Port-a-Cath |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
PICC |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
central venous catheterization |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
thrombosis |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
catheter related infection |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
Port-a-Cath |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
PICC |
| 700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Sánchez Rodríguez, Daniel |
| 9 (RLIN) |
3551 |
| 710 2# - ADDED ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME |
|---|
| Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element |
Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca. |
| Subordinate unit |
Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia Salus Infirmorum. |
| -- |
Grado en Enfermería. |
| 9 (RLIN) |
489 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Universal Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type |
TFG/TFM |
