MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
03986nas a22003017a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20220719104157.0 |
| 006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
m|||||r|||| 00| 0 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
ta |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
171219t2019 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa | |
| 022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
|---|
| International Standard Serial Number |
0211-5638 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
Salus Infirmorum |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
Dolor lumbar crónico y pronación unilateral o bilateral del pie = |
| Remainder of title |
Low back pain and unilateral or bilateral pronation of the foot / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
M. Pabón Carrasco, I.C. Palomo Toucedo, P.V. Munuera Martínez, L. Fernández Seguín y A. Castro Méndez |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
|---|
| General note |
Este artículo se encuentra disponible en su edición impresa. |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc. note |
Bibliografía: p.190-191 |
| 520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Antecedentes y objetivo Diferentes estudios han defendido la relación entre la pronación del pie y el dolor lumbar crónico (DLC). Sin embargo, no se hallan artículos que analicen la repercusión que puede existir entre la postura en pronación de un solo pie y su influencia en el DLC frente a la pronación en ambos pies. Por ello, se ha planteado evaluar la intensidad del dolor lumbar en sujetos pronadores con un índice de postura del pie (IPP) superior a+6 en un pie comparado con sujetos con pronación superior a+6 en ambos pies.<br/><br/>Material y método Estudio observacional transversal con muestreo por conveniencia en una muestra total de 116 sujetos. Se comparó el DLC en un grupo con dolor lumbar crónico y posición pronada de un pie (IPP, superior a+6), frente a un grupo de sujetos con DLC e IPP superior a+6 en ambos. Como herramientas de valoración de la variable dependiente se utilizó la escala visual analógica (EVA) y el Índice de discapacidad de Oswestry (IDO) para dolor lumbar.<br/><br/>Resultados No se encontró correlación entre la posición unilateral o bilateral en pronación y la intensidad del DLC. La pronación de un solo pie no pareció mostrarse como mayor factor de riesgo en el DLC que la bilateral (IDO p=0,700; EVA p=0,235).<br/><br/>Conclusiones No se encuentran diferencias estadísticas en el DLC en el grupo de pacientes con un IPP del pie en pronación frente a los sujetos con posición en pronación bilateral. Futuros estudios son necesarios. |
| 520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Background and objectives Different studies have defended the relationship between the pronated foot and chronic low back pain (CLBP). Nevertheless, according to current knowledge, there is no evidence on the possible influence of pronation of one foot or both feet and the intensity of the CLBP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity of the CLBP in subjects with one or two pronated feet with a foot posture index (FPI, superior to+6) in one foot compared with subjects with CLBP and FPI of+6 in both feet.<br/><br/>Material and method A cross-sectional study was conducted with convenience sampling, composed of 116 subjects who presented with CLBP and with two or at least one pronated foot. The CLBP was compared in one group with CLBP and one foot in the pronated position (foot posture index (FPI)>+6), against a group of subjects with CLBP and an FPI>+6 in both feet. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry low back pain index (ODI) were used as tools for assessing the dependent variable.<br/><br/>Results There were no significant differences between the unilateral or bilateral foot pronation and the intensity of the CLBP. The pronation of only one foot does not seem to be a greater risk factor in CLBP than bilateral pronation (ODI: p=.700; VAS: p=.235).<br/><br/>Conclusions There is no evidence of a higher rate of chronic low back pain in the group of patients with a pronated position of one foot compared to subjects with both feet pronated, as assessed with the VAS and ODI scale. Further studies are necessary. |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
dolor lumbar |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
pie |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
pronado |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
postura |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
low back pain |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
foot |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
pronation |
| 653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
|---|
| Uncontrolled term |
posture |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Related parts |
-- 2019, v. 41, n. 4, p. 185-191 |
| Title |
Fisioterapia |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Universal Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type |
Artículo de revista |
