Visceral responses to spinal manipulation / (Record no. 13002)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02040nas a22002297a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20210316111139.0 |
006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS | |
fixed length control field | m|||||r|||| 00| 0 |
007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | ta |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 171219t2012 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa | |
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER | |
International Standard Serial Number | 1050-6411 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
Transcribing agency | Salus Infirmorum |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Visceral responses to spinal manipulation / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | Philip S. Bolton, Brian Budgell |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
General note | Este artículo se encuentra disponible en su edición impresa. |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE | |
Bibliography, etc. note | Bibliografía: p.784 |
520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | While spinal manipulation is widely seen as a reasonable treatment option for biomechanical disorders of the spine, such as neck pain and low back pain, the use of spinal manipulation to treat non-musculoskeletal complaints remains controversial. This controversy is due in part to the perception that there is no robust neurobiological rationale to justify using a biomechanical treatment of the spine to address a disorder of visceral function. This paper therefore looks at the physiological evidence that spinal manipulation can impact visceral function. A structured search was conducted, using PubMed and the Index to Chiropractic Literature, to construct of corpus of primary data studies in healthy human subjects of the effects of spinal manipulation on visceral function. The corpus of literature is not large, and the greatest number of papers concerns cardiovascular function. Authors often attribute visceral effects of spinal manipulation to somato-autonomic reflexes. While this is not unreasonable, little attention is paid to alternative mechanisms such as somato-humoural pathways. Thus, while the literature confirms that mechanical stimulation of the spine modulates some organ functions in some cohorts, a comprehensive neurobiological rationale for this general phenomenon has yet to appear.<br/> |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED | |
Uncontrolled term | Somato-autonomic reflex |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED | |
Uncontrolled term | Somato-visceral reflex |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED | |
Uncontrolled term | Spinal manipulation |
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Related parts | -- 2012, v. 22, n. 5, p. 777-784 |
Title | Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Universal Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Artículo de revista |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Collection code | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Universal Decimal Classification | Non-fiction | Revistas y artículos | Revistas y artículos | 03/12/2020 | PP | 5653 | 03/12/2020 | 03/12/2020 | Artículo de revista |