MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
04594nas a22003857a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20210325135132.0 |
006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS |
fixed length control field |
m|||||r|||| 00| 0 |
007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
ta |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
171219t2009 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa | |
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER |
International Standard Serial Number |
1575-4146 |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Transcribing agency |
Salus Infirmorum |
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Catéter venoso central de inserción periférica (PICC) con múltiples luces: una buena opción para monitorización de presión y tratamiento = |
Remainder of title |
Venous catheter peripherally inserted central (picc) multiple light: a good choice for pressure monitoring and treatmen / |
Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Gómez-Palomar, C, Miquel Pérez, T |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
General note |
Este artículo se encuentra disponible en su edición impresa. |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
Bibliography, etc. note |
Bibliografía: p.102-103 |
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc. |
• Objetivo: Analizar las diferencias en cuanto a riesgos y utilidad, entre catéteres centrales convencionales (CVC) y centrales de inserción periférica (PICC) • Método: estudio cuasiexperimental con 125 catéteres. Se implantó PICC a quienes necesitaban control hemodinámico invasivo o varios accesos venosos, no portadores de CVC. Se recogieron datos demográficos, patológicos y los referentes a los catéteres: localización, complicaciones en la implantación y por su permanencia, utilización, tiempo de vida, causa de la retirada y cultivos. • Resultados: analizados 125 catéteres: 55 PICC y 70 CVC. Implantación sin complicaciones importantes. • Causa de la retirada: 91 (81,24%) habían finalizado su utilidad (52 CVC y 39 PICC), 4 retiradas accidentales, 8 por sospecha de infección (4 PICC y 4 CVC), 2 por trombosis/flebitis, ambos PICC; 1(PICC) por bucle y otro (PICC) por perforación a nivel de axilar o subclavia. Se retiraron 5 CVC de forma preventiva a los 8 días. La duración media de los catéteres es de 7,6 +- 5,05 (1-24) días. 8,9 +- 5,34 (1-23) para los CVC y 6,4+- 4,75 (1-24) para los PICC. Se infectaron 17 catéteres (15,17%): 9 CVC y 8 PICC. 8 (3 PICC /5 CVC) utilizados para Nutrición Parenteral (NPT). Al relacionar las diferentes variables no encontramos diferencia significativa en la presencia de infección, flebitis/trombosis entre los PICC y CVC, ni en ningún otro tipo de complicación. <br/>• Conclusión: el PICC es un catéter tan válido como los convencionales. No hay diferencia en su rendimiento o riesgos en su implantación y utilización. |
520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc. |
• Objective: To analyze the differences as for risks and utility, between conventional central catheters (CVC) and central of outlying insert (PICC) • Method: Study cuasiexperimental with 125 catheters. PICC was implanted whom needed control hemodynamic invasive or several venous accesses, non carrier of CVC. Demographic, pathological data and the concerning to the catheters were picked up: localisation, complications in the installation and for their permanency, use, time of life, causes of the retreat and cultivations. • Results: analyzed 125 catheters: 55 PICC and 70 CVC. Installation without important complications. Cause of the retreat: 91 (81,24%) their utility concluded (52 CVC and 39 PICC), 4 accidental retreats, 8 for infection suspicion (4 PICC and 4 CVC), 2 for thrombosis/phlebitis, both PICC; 1(PICC) for curl and other (PICC) for perforation at axillary or subclavia level . 5 CVC preventive retreat at the 8 days. The average duration of the catheters is of 7,6 + - 5,05 (1-24) days. 8,9 + - 5,34 (1-23) for the CVC and 6,4+ - 4,75 (1-24) for the PICC. 17 catheters were infected (15,17%): 9 CVC and 8 PICC. 8 (3 PICC /5 CVC) used for Nutrition Parenteral (NPT). Relating the different variables we don’t find a significant difference in the infection presence, phlebitis/thrombosis between the PICC and CVC, neither in any other complication type. • Conclusion: the PICC is such a valid catheter as the conventional ones. There is not difference in their performances or risks associated with their instáisation and uses. |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
catéter |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
inserción periférica |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
PICC |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
multilumen |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
complicaciones |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
infección |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
trombosis |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
catheter |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
outlying insert |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
PICC |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
multilumen |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
complications |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
infection |
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED |
Uncontrolled term |
thrombosis |
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
Related parts |
-- 2009, v. 16, n. 47-48, p. 99-103 |
Title |
Enfermería en Cardiología |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://www.enfermeriaencardiologia.com/wp-content/uploads/47_48_19.pdf">https://www.enfermeriaencardiologia.com/wp-content/uploads/47_48_19.pdf</a> |
Link text |
Acceso al documento |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Universal Decimal Classification |
Koha item type |
Artículo de revista |