Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia Salus Infirmorum

Prevalencia del dolor pélvico y lumbar en el embarazo. Estudio piloto = (Record no. 11970)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04149nas a22002777a 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20210427155949.0
006 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS
fixed length control field m|||||r|||| 00| 0
007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field ta
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 171219t2015 sp ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa |
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1135-8599
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency Salus Infirmorum
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Prevalencia del dolor pélvico y lumbar en el embarazo. Estudio piloto =
Remainder of title Prevalence in lumbar and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Pilot study /
Statement of responsibility, etc. García-Báez E, Carmona-Barrientos I, Viñolo-Gil MJ, Rodríguez-Huguet M, Pérez-Cabeza V, Ruiz-Molinero MC.
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Este artículo se encuentra disponible en su edición impresa.
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc. note Bibliografía: p. 95-96
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Introducción: el dolor de espalda afecta a gran número de mujeres tras un embarazo normal, ocasionando un elevado absentismo laboral. En el embarazo, debe diferenciarse el dolor lumbar, el pélvico, o ambos. Objetivo: determinar la prevalencia del dolor pélvico frente al lumbar y al lumbopélvico en una población de mujeres embarazadas de la provincia de Cádiz, y cuantificar si, en una serie de variables, existen diferencias entre las mujeres que presentan dolor y las que no lo presentan, así como, en presencia de dolor, si existen tales diferencias en función de su localización. Material y método: estudio transversal, descriptivo y observacional, realizado con mujeres embarazadas asistidas en el Centro de Salud Pinillo Chico del Puerto de Santa María. Se obtuvo una muestra de 31 embarazadas con edades entre 19 y 40 años. Aquellas que indicaron que padecían dolor fueron sometidas a test de provocación y funcionales. Posteriormente se clasificó el dolor siguiendo los criterios de dolor pélvico, lumbar o lumbopélvico. Las variables consideradas fueron: edad, altura, peso, tener hijos o no, padecer o no dolor, localización del dolor (pélvico, lumbar o lumbopélvico) y semana de gestación. Resultados: el 83,9 % de las embarazadas padecían dolor, de las cuales, 38,7 % pélvico, 32,3 % lumbopelvico y 12,9 % lumbar. Las mujeres con dolor presentaron un peso significativamente superior a las gestantes sin dolor. Se obtuvo una relación significativa entre la edad y cada tipo de dolor. Conclusiones: el dolor pélvico presenta mayor prevalencia en la muestra estudiada frente al lumbar y al lumbopélvico.
520 8# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Introduction: back pain affects a large number of women after a normal pregnancy, causing high work absenteeism. In pregnancy, lumbar pain, pelvic pain, or both should be differentiated. Objective: to determine the prevalence of pelvic pain against lumbar and lumbopelvic pain in a population of pregnant women in the province of Cádiz, and quantify whether, in a series of variables, there are differences between women who have pain and those who do not have pain. , as well as, in the presence of pain, if there are such differences depending on their location. Material and method: cross-sectional, descriptive and observational study, carried out with pregnant women assisted at the Pinillo Chico Health Center of the Port of Santa María. A sample of 31 pregnant women aged between 19 and 40 years was obtained. Those who indicated that they suffered pain were subjected to provocation and functional tests. Subsequently, pain was classified according to the criteria of pelvic, lumbar or lumbopelvic pain. The variables considered were: age, height, weight, having children or not, suffering or not pain, location of pain (pelvic, lumbar or lumbopelvic) and pregnancy week. Results: 83.9% of the pregnant women suffered from pain, of which 38.7% pelvic, 32.3% lumbopelvic and 12.9% lumbar. Women with pain had a significantly higher weight than pregnant women without pain. A significant relationship between age and each type of pain was obtained. Conclusions: pelvic pain has a higher prevalence in the sample studied against lumbar and lumbopelvic.
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term dolor pélvico, ,
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term embarazo
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term prevalencia
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term pelvic pain
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term pregnancy
653 14 - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term prevalence
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Related parts -- 2015 v.44, n.2, p 87-96
Title Cuestiones de fisioterapia
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Universal Decimal Classification
Koha item type Artículo de revista
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Collection code Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type Public note
    Universal Decimal Classification     Non-fiction Revistas y artículos Revistas y artículos 17/10/2019   PP6 v44(2):87-96 17/10/2019 17/10/2019 Artículo de revista Cajonera

Powered by Koha